Thanks Ian for drawing our attention to the Dynamic Designerweb site.
I have read the brief explanation in the image below but I haveseen no tutorial examples to elaborate on the explanation. Thesurgical shear could certainly use this function because pullingthe trigger towards you moves the cutter blade away from you, butif this explanation is there, then it must be buried deep in thehyperlinks where I failed to spot it. Perhaps this is why somepeople prefer video training; nothing is buried where it can beoverlooked.
I Googled "action-reaction" and received a zillion explanations ofNewton's third law, but that seems not to relate to objects nottouching or otherwise connected.
In the Cosmos context, it seems to me (coming from the world of PIDand reverse acting transmitters) feasible to explain the"action-reaction force" as a "reverse acting coupler".
Your clarification will be welcome.
SolidworksMotion Studies
I have read the brief explanation in the image below but I haveseen no tutorial examples to elaborate on the explanation. Thesurgical shear could certainly use this function because pullingthe trigger towards you moves the cutter blade away from you, butif this explanation is there, then it must be buried deep in thehyperlinks where I failed to spot it. Perhaps this is why somepeople prefer video training; nothing is buried where it can beoverlooked.
I Googled "action-reaction" and received a zillion explanations ofNewton's third law, but that seems not to relate to objects nottouching or otherwise connected.
In the Cosmos context, it seems to me (coming from the world of PIDand reverse acting transmitters) feasible to explain the"action-reaction force" as a "reverse acting coupler".
Your clarification will be welcome.
SolidworksMotion Studies
