Hello everyone,
I am working on a 3D geomechanical model in Abaqus to simulate CO₂ sequestration, closely following the methodology described in the paper by Karimnezhad et al. (2014), "Investigation of caprock integrity for CO₂ sequestration...".
My primary goal is to correctly establish the initial in-situ conditions before starting the injection simulation. I would like to verify if my approach for setting up the Geostatic step is the correct and most robust method.
Here is a summary of my setup for the initial equilibrium:
1. Analysis Steps:
- Step-1: A
Geostaticstep to establish the initial equilibrium. - Step-2: A
Soilsstep to simulate the 10-year injection period.
2. Key Initial Conditions (Applied in the "Initial" Step):
- Initial Stress Field: I am using a
Predefined FieldwithType: Geostatic stress.- The vertical stress is defined as a linear gradient from -83.1 MPa at the top of the model (Vertical coordinate 1 = 0) to -96.25 MPa at the bottom (Vertical coordinate 2 = -532 m).
- The anisotropic horizontal stresses are defined using
Lateral coefficient 1: 1.08andLateral coefficient 2: 0.96, based on the paper's ratios (\\\$\\sigma_H/\\sigma_v\\\$ and \\\$\\sigma_h/\\sigma_v\\\$).
- Initial Pore Pressure Field: I am using a
Predefined FieldwithType: Pore pressureand a linear elevation distribution.- The pressure is defined as a linear gradient from 34.1 MPa at the top of the model (Vertical coordinate 1 = 0) to 39.69 MPa at the bottom (Vertical coordinate 2 = -532 m), reflecting the initial hydrostatic condition of the formation fluid (brine).
3. Loads and Boundary Conditions for the Geostatic Step:
- Load: A
Gravityload with a magnitude of 9.81 m/s² is applied in the negative Z-direction during theGeostaticstep. - Boundary Conditions: Roller boundaries are applied to the sides of the model (U1=U2=0), and a pinned boundary is applied to the bottom (U3=0).
My Questions:
- Is this the standard and most robust method to define an initial, anisotropic stress gradient that is in equilibrium with the body forces?
- Specifically, is combining a
Geostatic stressPredefined Field with aGravityload in theGeostaticstep the correct workflow to achieve the stress state described in the paper? - Are there any potential issues or conflicts I might have missed in this setup?
Any advice or confirmation from experienced users would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you for your time.
Best regards,
