In my AEC experience, virtual construction simulations can become an important means of communication. They bring the whole project team together through easy-to-understand visualizations which are the result of a complex set of elements and criteria. The challenge is, that often these simulation scenarios require a significant amount of time to setup and cannot be easily changed once they are started. In addition, they often exist in a separate environment from the main source of project information.
The common data environment in 3DEXPERIENCE allows for continuity from design and engineering activities to the project construction planning. Changes in the design can be quickly and automatically incorporated without massive re-work of the construction simulation setup. Automation capabilities are available for beginners and more advanced users (xGenerative Design and Enterprise Knowledge Language aka EKL) which can drive much of the simulation setup process.
In the example above I demonstrate the interactions on the 3DEXPERIENCE Platform between a Project Manager, Production Engineer and Facade Designer. An initial series of facade assembly simulations are setup in DELMIA from the the building model in CATIA. First this is done step-by-step and then through an automated process. The facade design changes and the assembly simulation (which automatically updates) helps to identify potential issues. These issues are quickly addressed and another series of virtual construction scenario are provided in response.
If you've dealt with this topic in the past or are currently investigating it, I'd love to get your thoughts.
