The new 2016 structural member feature naming convention is creating problems in my cut lists.

It is supposed to be "Type Size (n) where n is the suffix that indicates the number of identical instances of the feature", which might be what they intended, but I have had several instances where add another instance of a Type later and it restarts the numbering so that I have two features in my tree called Type (1).

This is wreaking havoc in my cut list description as it keeps the description from the first Type (1) instance for both bodies.

Is anyone else having this problem?