I realize that this forum is a place to post questions youneed help on, so most of the questions will start out negative.When I read here i get the feeling we should stay clear of Toolbox.
We are in the process of moving to managing hardwre items such asscrews bolts o-rings etc. We can either make and manage all of ourown items and configurations or we can customize toolbox.
The advantages of Toolbox seem to be:
SolidWorks takes care of the models, we just need to add the data.
Smart fastners with the potential of more smart functionality later
O-ring grooves, keyways etc.
Upgrades of SW should follow with upgrades of Toolbox.
Are there people who are happy with Toolbox? Are we seeing theunhappy few, but not the happy majority? Or is ita lso an unhappymajority?
Solidworks 2008 sp 4.0
SmarTeam V5R18 SP 4
Doug MurraySolidworksToolbox
We are in the process of moving to managing hardwre items such asscrews bolts o-rings etc. We can either make and manage all of ourown items and configurations or we can customize toolbox.
The advantages of Toolbox seem to be:
SolidWorks takes care of the models, we just need to add the data.
Smart fastners with the potential of more smart functionality later
O-ring grooves, keyways etc.
Upgrades of SW should follow with upgrades of Toolbox.
Are there people who are happy with Toolbox? Are we seeing theunhappy few, but not the happy majority? Or is ita lso an unhappymajority?
Solidworks 2008 sp 4.0
SmarTeam V5R18 SP 4
Doug MurraySolidworksToolbox
