Presently, the solidworks hole callout adds a space betweenthe thread standard and the thread class, so an annotation thatnormally reads
2-56 UNC-2B THRU
looks like
2-56 UNC - 2B THRU
Now, I cannot, in my wildest dream imagine anyone misinterpretingthat callout unless it involved a very strict automation programreading the drawing. However, our checking engineers want itwithout the spaces. I checked the ASME requirements handbook andwhile it shows the thread class without the spaces, it doesn'texplicitly flag them as incorrect the way it does the words'typical' or 'places'
So what do you guy's think about the hole callout function, editingit and the issue of spaces in the thread class?
All points of view and suggestions welcome.
ThanksSolidworksDrawings And Detailing
2-56 UNC-2B THRU
looks like
2-56 UNC - 2B THRU
Now, I cannot, in my wildest dream imagine anyone misinterpretingthat callout unless it involved a very strict automation programreading the drawing. However, our checking engineers want itwithout the spaces. I checked the ASME requirements handbook andwhile it shows the thread class without the spaces, it doesn'texplicitly flag them as incorrect the way it does the words'typical' or 'places'
So what do you guy's think about the hole callout function, editingit and the issue of spaces in the thread class?
All points of view and suggestions welcome.
ThanksSolidworksDrawings And Detailing
