Hi,
I have reading and using the MagicGrid BoK V2, I do have questions about satisfy traceability between textual requirements and model elements.
Below a capture from 3 different diagram from the MagicGrid BoK V2:
- Satisfy traceability matrix between subsystem textual requirements and model elements on the left.
- Subsystem textual requirements - top right.
- Subsystem activity diagram, bottom -right.
The BoK example shows the satisfy traceability AND for behaviour should be done between call behaviour action and states, this matches the SysML standard.
For functional textual requirements.
- Not all of them traced to call behaviour. Should they be as they capture functions (aka verbs) in the textual requirement?
- Can a function (aka call behaviour action) within the swinlane have a satisfy traceability link to a functional textual requirement? I think functions within swinlanes are not for the system-of-interest, but convey that subsystems will have to refine further at lower layer. Hence, should it be traced to parent activity only?
- If it was captured 10 functional textual requirements, should it be captured 10 call behaviour actions?
Thank you,
Hélder Castro
